<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lithostech.com &#187; django</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lithostech.com/tag/django/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lithostech.com</link>
	<description>making it work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>serving up python with the quickness</title>
		<link>http://lithostech.com/2010/04/serving-up-python-with-the-quickness/</link>
		<comments>http://lithostech.com/2010/04/serving-up-python-with-the-quickness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stevecrozz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nginx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uwsgi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lithostech.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inspired by Justin Lilly, I spent some time looking at various ways of running python web applications with an eye to performance. Nicholas Piël has done some great work testing and documenting many of them. Gevent looks like a great option as does CherryPy, but uWSGI caught my eye because it provides an nginx module [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lithostech.com/2010/04/serving-up-python-with-the-quickness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>django database fixtures are not good</title>
		<link>http://lithostech.com/2008/10/django-database-fixtures-are-not-good/</link>
		<comments>http://lithostech.com/2008/10/django-database-fixtures-are-not-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stevecrozz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[flickr-photo:id=2225768345,size=t]I've been working on a project using django, and I've got some great things to say about it. I also have some nasty things to say. I'm currently prototyping, which means the databases I work with get destroyed and recreated regularly. I normally have a set of test data that should always be present in the system. Database fixtures to the rescue!

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lithostech.com/2008/10/django-database-fixtures-are-not-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

